Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 overall score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has much less brightness, they both have a screen of the same size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher video definition.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.