Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with a better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.