Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with an 81.1 score against 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have a screen of the same size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.