Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a display of the same size. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a better resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.