Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60, having a 77.7 score against 72.5. These devices come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The HTC One M9 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit CPU.
HTC One M9 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a much smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 60 takes better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Motorola Edge 60 has a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.