Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a global score of 77 against 72.5. HTC U Ultra has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 less CPU cores and less RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra features a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 captures better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
The HTC U Ultra has a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 60 has a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.