Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 score. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 60 counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 60 has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.