Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 score. The LG Velvet features an incredibly better display than Motorola Edge 60, because it has a little bit bigger screen. LG Velvet counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 60 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
The LG Velvet has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 60 has longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.