Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the Motorola Edge 60, getting an 83.8 score against 72.5. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little bit smaller display. Galaxy A50 features a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 60 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 features a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.