Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60's score of 72.5. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a lot better screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a quite smaller screen.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 60 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 60 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.