Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Edge 60, getting a score of 85.5 against 72.5. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Galaxy A51 has a way better display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a quite smaller display.
Galaxy A51 features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 60, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 60 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a more MP camera, a larger camera aperture and a much bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A51 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 60 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.