Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a overall score of 90.8 against 72.5. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 60 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a camera with a higher 50 MP resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 60 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.