Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60's global score of 72.5. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.