Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a global score of 75.8 against 72.5. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a way better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Motorola Edge 60 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.