Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60, with a 76.9 score against 72.5. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy A70 features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 60. Both have a display with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 60 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 60 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.