Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than Motorola Edge 60, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 72.5. Galaxy A71's body weights the same than the Motorola Edge 60, but it's thicker. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60. Both have a display of the same size. Galaxy A71 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 60 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.