Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-01-06 |
| -- | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60, getting a score of 79.2 against 72.5. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 73 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.