Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a 98.9 score against 72.5. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60, because it has a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video quality, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels back camera.
Motorola Edge 60 features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5200mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.