Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than Motorola Edge 60, with a general score of 81.2 against 72.5. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a way better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.