Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 60's overall score of 72.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Galaxy Note 5 features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.