Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 60's overall score of 72.5. Galaxy Note10 features a lot better screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller display. The Galaxy Note10 has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 60. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10's memory for apps and games is just as good as the Motorola Edge 60 one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 49% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.