Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| -- | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a overall score of 77.6 against 72.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note4 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 60 has a better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5200mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.