Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 566 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller display. Galaxy S20 counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 60 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a back camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 60 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.