Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Edge 60, having a global score of 90.8 against 72.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 60, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller screen. Motorola Edge 60 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 60 has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.