Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 overall score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better screen than Motorola Edge 60, because it has a quite larger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 60 features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 5200mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.