Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 501 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 overall score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 60. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.