Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 432 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 overall score. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has 4.4.2 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version, offering a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lot smaller display. Motorola Edge 60 has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 60 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.