Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60's global score of 72.5. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a way smaller display and way darker display. Galaxy S7 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores.
Motorola Edge 60 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.