Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than Motorola Edge 60, with a overall score of 81.7 against 72.5. Galaxy S8 has a way better looking display than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller display. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a way better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 73 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.