Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is better than Motorola Edge 60, having a score of 83.3 against 72.5. The Galaxy S9 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S9 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 60 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 73% bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.