Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Motorola Edge 60, having an 81 score against 72.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Galaxy XCover Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 60 has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 features improved battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.