Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is way better than Motorola Edge 60's global score of 72.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60. They have a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Motorola Edge 60, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 60 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 60 has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 58% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.