Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60's score of 72.5. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Edge 60 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and a better resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 has a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.