Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than Motorola Edge 60's score of 72.5. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60. Both of them have a screen with the same size.
Motorola Edge 60 has a greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 60 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.