Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The Motorola edge construction is newer than Google Pixel 3a's, although it is thicker and heavier.
Motorola edge counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density.
Motorola edge takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola edge counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola edge, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.