Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Motorola edge's design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
Motorola edge has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola edge and Google Pixel 3a XL have very similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
Motorola edge counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Motorola edge has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.