Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is better than the LG G7 Fit, having an 89.6 score against 77. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though the Motorola edge is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is heavier and thicker. The LG G7 Fit has a lot better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The Motorola edge has a little bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM memory. The Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola edge shoots way better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also has a much more megapixels camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola edge has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.