Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, having an 89.6 score against 82.5. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Motorola edge is notably newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is heavier and a lot thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola edge. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Motorola edge has a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a much larger sensor and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Motorola edge counts with a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola edge has superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola edge not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.