Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Even though the Motorola edge is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it is heavier and way thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola edge. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola edge counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola edge has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola edge features a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola edge also counts with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.