Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is much better than LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Motorola edge's construction is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is heavier and thicker. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola edge. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola edge counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola edge counts with superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size. The Motorola edge counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola edge also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola edge, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.