Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. Although Motorola edge and LG V60 ThinQ were only released 2 months apart, the Motorola edge design is a little thicker but somewhat lighter than LG V60 ThinQ. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit bigger display. Motorola edge has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola edge shoots better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have a F1.8 aperture, the same resolution back camera, the same video definition, a same size camera sensor and the same video frame rates.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.