Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Although the Motorola edge is incredibly newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is heavier and way thicker. The Motorola edge features a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a display that's very similar to Motorola edge's screen, because although the Moto Z2 Play has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels amount per display inch. Motorola edge captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola edge has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge features a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola edge, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.