Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Motorola edge is a just a little bit thinner and lighter phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released with only 7 months difference. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola edge has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola edge. Both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the same quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a same size screen.
Motorola edge counts with a much better memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola edge also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola edge shoots just a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola edge is also cheap compared to the nubia Red Magic 3S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.