Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is better than the Galaxy A22, having an 89.6 score against 76.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, Motorola edge's body is older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A22.
The Motorola edge features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a better pixels count in each inch of display. The Motorola edge features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola edge has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola edge counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola edge also has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola edge counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.