Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is slightly better than Galaxy A22 5G, having an 89.6 score against 84.6. Motorola edge's design is a bit lighter than Galaxy A22 5G, but it is just a little thicker and was released around 14 months before. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version.
The Motorola edge features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A22 5G has a little more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola edge takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola edge also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Motorola edge features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.