Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is better than the Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. The Motorola edge body is somewhat lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. Motorola edge features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola edge features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Motorola edge shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has just a little better battery life than Motorola edge, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.