Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is slightly better than Galaxy A50, with a general score of 89.6 against 83.8. Even though the Motorola edge is newer than Galaxy A50, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Motorola edge features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola edge also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a bit higher pixels amount in each screen inch. The Motorola edge has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A50, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Motorola edge has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola edge features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution, a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.