Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola edge's 89.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is just a little lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola edge, even when both were released only 1 months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola edge has Android 10 version.
Motorola edge features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better screen pixels density.
The Motorola edge takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola edge counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Motorola edge also has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's battery performance is very similar to Motorola edge's battery lifetime.
The Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.