Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is slightly better than Motorola edge, having a 90.7 score against 89.6. The Galaxy A52 construction is newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola edge's, but it is also just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a slightly better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher display pixels density.
The Motorola edge has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola edge counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 features a battery life that is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola edge. The Galaxy A52's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola edge, both of them have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 0.59 inches sensor and a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.