Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A71, getting an 89.6 score against 87.5. Despite being the best in this review, the Motorola edge design is thicker and a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A71 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A71 and Motorola edge have really similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a little greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a same size display. Motorola edge features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A71 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola edge. Both have a camera with a 64 megapixels, the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video definition. The Motorola edge features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71's battery performance is very similar to Motorola edge's battery performance.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy A71, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A71. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A71, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.